How can the DAO improve the decentralization of power within Dash Society?
Is the proposal system really working effectively as a decentralized governance system which leads to more decentralization of power?
What is the most important thing that could be done to improve the effectiveness of the proposal system in the aspect of decentralization of power to avoid single point of failures (employees)?
Another option for a greater (and healthier) decentralization: Creating wealth for DASH, preferably through its own use ... and blocking it in Mnodes (that can be used based on those who have generated that use - A kind of "popular sub-daos" that seek the presence, perspective and expression of the gigantic community marginalized by the centralized power structure in DASH - ).
The proposals prevail, in enormous proportion, the integral parasitism towards DASH (economic and intellectual parasitism - of which we will speak in another moment -), because many of them propose the expansion of DASH - which is applauded collectively - projecting it towards other economic ecosystems (generally, fiat) through points of provision of liquidity, pos systems, credit / debit / prepaid cards ... And it is at that point, outside the DASH ecosystem, in that presumed projection (in which drainage is almost indispensable of wealth of the original ecosystem) where the "altruistic expansors" of DASH distort the characteristics of this technological gem by latrándola with custodies, commissions, delays, etc. We speak of operational delays of minutes / hours with respect to the second of Instant send ... private custodians against the security of private keys in possession, or commissions of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, etc., on the total amount to be managed. .. versus TOTAL TX rates of hundredths of $ ... which are the references that a DASH user should take advantage of.
Obviously, this management outside the DASH ecosystem minimizes the technological benefits created by DCG in a negative proportion of hundreds, even thousands of times IN THE NEGATIVE SENSE. It is simply delirious.
I believe that the key to democratizing and decentralizing DASH is not to seek mass adoption with all this type of presumed aid to DASH - more than questionable - ... but, first of all, to direct the financed activities to the use of the existing community. ..and that this use repersutates in DASH ... and encourages the active participation of the community, varying its profile, currently testimonial, and integrating it into its mechanisms of integration, realization, free expression and decision in the ecosystem. Which is perfectly possible, want the beneficiaries of the more than questionable hierarchy of the DASH ecosystem ... or not.